dc.description.abstract |
There exists a general understanding in the building construction practice that any design
change to the project will logically be beneficial to the project. Based on that premise, this
study aimed to explore benefits obtained through design changes instituted in the building
construction projects. It was objectively set out to identify the types and causes, their
targets as well as the resulting benefits of the design changes instituted in the course of
execution of building construction projects.
To this effect, four case projects were evaluated through documentary reviews. In-depth
interviews were also conducted with stakeholders such as project Architects, Engineers,
Project Managers and Quantity Surveyors involved in those projects to correlate and
corroborate as well as comprehend data obtained through documentary reviews. Data were
collected and recorded electronically, transcribed and analyzed by using computer
software. Qualitative data were analyzed using MAXQDA program. On the other hand, the
Microsoft excel software was used to produce charts and tables for some of the numerical
data gathered.
Findings indicated that design changes originated from the inadequate detailing of works,
inexperience in specialty works, laxity in managing design and construction works, lack of
understanding of design works and uncertainty related to project requirements. The
benefits obtained through design changes instituted included improvement of the projects
performance, enhancement of both the clients’ and end-user satisfaction, reduction of the
project’s construction and whole life costs. However, these benefits were hampered by the
higher expenses incurred in attaining them. Higher expenses were due to late institution of
design changes in the course of construction of the case projects. Indisputably, design
changes would be more beneficial if instituted up to the scheme design stage as long as
both the consulting team and the client play their roles accordingly. Beyond that, it would
be very difficult to control their reactive effects which are evidently very expensive and
disruptive.
However, Value Engineering (VE) applied after the scheme design stage and before
commencement of the project detailing stage can highly be used to limit the number of
adverse design changes in the subsequent stages of construction projects. The notable
benefits of design change in construction project highly depend on the stage at which they
are initiated and instituted. Design Changes instituted at early stages of design involves
less personnel and result into less or no extra payment to consultants, lead to less material
and time waste and therefore are deemed to be more beneficial.
The study recommends that design changes should be controlled at early design stages of
the project through diligent design and detailing works. It also recommends application of
value concepts such as Value Engineering (VE) and Value Audit (VA) as early as the
scheme design stage of works is completed and before commencement of detailing works
of the same. That would tremendously limit likely and unnecessary design changes, costs
escalations, material wastes as well as lead to enhancement of project performance and
quality. |
en_US |